Google Search

Showing posts with label Livelihood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Livelihood. Show all posts

Saturday, March 31, 2012

Thoughts on the Buddhist idea of “Right Livelihood”

Home Dharma Dew

Victoria, Canada -- Much of our lifetime is spent earning a living. Our economy depends upon the productivity of the workforce. Today I want to introduce the Buddhist concept of “right livelihood” and suggest that including meditation as part of the workplace would represent an overall improvement for all concerned.

Modern studies show that excelling in a variety of emotional competencies, not just a few, is a strong indicator of leadership success. The nine qualities shown to be most important are: Initiative, achievement drive, adaptability, influence, team leadership, political awareness, empathy, self-confidence and developing others.  First, here’s a basic primer on the Buddhist approach to livelihood.

Buddhist practice follows a template called the “8-fold path”. Altogether, the 8-fold path is called the “middle way” and satisfies the three conditions for a good life; wisdom, morality and meditation. “Right Livelihood” is one of the 8; (the others are; right view, right thought, right speech, right behaviour, right effort, right mindfulness, right contemplation). Livelihood is part of our moral life, according to classical Buddhism. What this means is that ‘right livelihood’ is tethered to “ahimsa”, a Sanskrit word meaning ‘harmlessness’. Buddhist morality can be summed up as ‘it is more important to be kind than to be right’.

This little essay is not intended to suggest that business owners convert to Buddhism. But it is undeniable that a good part of the social problems we experience today derive from a much weakened sense of morality associated with how we earn our living. Because there were few qualms about bankrupting and defrauding millions of homeowners and investors, a few made millions and our economy almost collapsed; and still might. A financial sector with a culture that discouraged doing harm would not have been so vulnerable. Zen meditation would be the heart of such a corporate culture.

It can be a complex undertaking. A company wishing to include ‘spiritual well being’ or ‘personal meaning’ or ‘emotional intelligence’ within its purview would need to consider carefully how to structure the new ideas so that they could be replicated, for example. It would also have to be sensitive to diversity and avoid offense or exclusion. However, approached with the appropriate respect, research and experience show that meditation can do all this and will reliably bring the following benefits:

    reduction in rates of absenteeism and sick leave
increases in measures of production
significant reductions in stress related anxieties
significant improvements in recruiting and retaining superior employees

So, for this alone, meditation is worth considering. But, more generally, our society needs to develop a better working vocabulary of right livelihood. This means not only the nature of the work itself, but also the skills and qualities each worker brings. Daniel Goleman in his book “Working With Emotional Intelligence” says, “Analysis done by dozens of different experts in close to five hundred corporations, government agencies, and nonprofit organizations worldwide have arrived independently at remarkably similar conclusions. Their conclusions all point to the paramount place of emotional intelligence in excellence on the job – virtually any job”. This is why meditation is so valuable; it is the way to cultivate and develop a workforce with high levels of emotional intelligence.

------------
Wayne Codling is a former Zen monastic and a lineage holder in the Soto Zen tradition. He teaches Zen-style meditation in various venues around Victoria.


View the original article here

Sunday, November 20, 2011

Is The Gambling Trade Right Livelihood?

Question: Will one who works in a casino or the general betting industry create negative karma? Is it Right Livelihood, according to the Noble Eightfold Path?

Answer: The more directly involved in the promotion of facilitation of gambling one is, the more will there be negative karma created, as gambling (due to greed) is a cause of suffering for many, and only a source of (easily addictive) fleeting happiness for the relatively fewer who win occasionally.

In the Anguttara Nikaya (AN 5.177), the Buddha taught this, ‘Monks, these five trades ought not to be plied by a lay-disciple… Trade in weapons, trade in human beings, trade in flesh, trade in spirits [intoxicants] and trade in poison.’ Although trade in gambling was not listed by the Buddha as Wrong Livelihood, he did advise against gambling in the Sigalovada Sutta:

‘And what six ways of squandering wealth are to be avoided? Young man, heedlessness caused by intoxication, roaming the streets at inappropriate times, habitual partying, compulsive gambling, bad companionship, and laziness are the six ways of squandering wealth….

‘These are the six dangers inherent in compulsive gambling: winning breeds resentment; the loser mourns lost property; savings are lost; one’s word carries no weight in a public forum; friends and colleagues display their contempt; and one is not sought after for marriage, since a gambler cannot adequately support a family…

‘Seduction, gambling, drinking, singing, dancing, Sleeping by day, wandering all around untimely, Harmful friends, utter stinginess: These things destroy a person…

‘The reckless companion can be identified by four things: by accompanying you in drinking, roaming around at night, partying, and gambling.’

As such, aligned to the the spirit of the guideline that a livelihood is unskilful if it is connected to causing or supporting suffering, the gambling trade is not a skilful occupation – even if it might be generally less directly harmful than the classic five listed unskilful occupations. It is also noteworthy that though abstaining from gambling is not listed as one of the basic lay precepts, it is also generally discouraged due to the same reasons in the sutta.

There are many vocations within the gambling industry. Some might be closely linked to the promoting and facilitating of gambling. These jobs are the least skilful in the context. Some jobs might be less directly linked. For example, one might be a cleaner in a casino. Given a choice, it is more skilful to be as distant from the entire gambling trade as possible. Though some betting companies do some charity, surely, it would be even better if they do not encourage gambling in the first place.

Related Articles:

Kasino Karma
http://moonpointer.com/new/2010/02/kasino-karma
Charity & Lottery?
http://moonpointer.com/new/2009/08/charity-lottery
Gambling or Investing?
http://moonpointer.com/new/2008/11/gambling-or-investing


View the original article here