Google Search

Showing posts with label activism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label activism. Show all posts

Saturday, September 1, 2012

Buddhist Activism and Public Policy: The International Network of Engaged

This interview took place via telephone on July 2.

Matt Bieber: Let's start with Think Sangha and the International Network of Engaged Buddhists. You've described Think Sangha as a venue in which you and others analyze social problems through a Buddhist lens, in which you try to "to think like a Buddhist." What does it mean to think like a Buddhist?

Jonathan Watts: We feel like there are a lot of people who are socially engaged who, as another friend said here, "just happen to be Buddhists." They're engaged and they're Buddhists, but their Buddhism is not really informing their social action. They tend to understand social issues using other frameworks, like Marxism for example, and not bringing concepts and ways of thinking unique to Buddhism to their social activism.

A really influential book and essay has been Ajahn Buddhadasa's "Dhammic Socialism," written in the 1970s. In [that book] he talks about the difference between Marxism and the socialism of the day and what he understands as Buddhist socialism.

That kind of spirit and that kind of thinking is what's behind Think Sangha. We're looking at the importance of engaged Buddhism on a certain level -- what's special about Buddhism that we can bring to social issues? We feel like Buddhism brings a lot of different important perspectives, so that's why we try to think like Buddhists.

Diana Winston wrote a good essay on this called "A Socially Engaged Buddhist Methodology." She has these different categories: One is to find textual resources, so can we go back and find something that the Buddha said that's related to the social issue that we're working on and use it as a means for legitimizing our action or developing our thought.

Another one is socializing or applying Buddhist principles and themes. This is something that A.T. Ariyaratne, the founder of the Sarvodaya Movement in Sri Lanka, did a tremendous amount of. An example of this is re-expressing the classic teaching of the Four Noble Truths as: What's the social problem? What are the causes, especially looking at structural and cultural violence? What's the vision? How do we realize it?

And thirdly there's the aspect of radical creativity in Buddhist practice. If I'm a seriously practicing Buddhist, then much of what I do will embody Buddhist principles, so I will act out of my Buddhist creativity.

We've had -- I wouldn't call it a tension; it's sort of more of a different flavor. In our work in Think Sangha, we have people like me and Santikaro (a leading disciple of Buddhadasa) and other people who come from Theravada backgrounds who love to follow the second style, kind of Abidhamma-like -- taking principles and applying them and thinking about modern society using Buddhist conceptual models. And some of our Zen friends dislike that, feeling it is artificial. They tend toward the third style of radical creativity, trying to speak more directly, and not using overly conceptualized models. I think both styles are useful.

Right -- various schools of Buddhism think about social problems pretty differently. So, when you say that you strive to think like a Buddhist, are you calling on what you take to be a common set of resources across all of Buddhism? Or is that statement more aspirational -- that you think this is the best of what Buddhism has to offer and you're therefore claiming the label? I could also see self-identifying in this way for strategic reasons -- knowing that this will have a cachet for a certain sector of the population, that it will lend you credibility and influence.

Well, I think fundamentally we use the word "Buddhist" as an identity marker -- we're proclaiming our identity. We're first and foremost Buddhist, maybe even before we're social activists ("socially engaged" Buddhism is a modifier of "Buddhist"). So I think the common grounding is that we're Buddhists, and then we have become socially active.

Obviously, there are people who became socially active first and then became Buddhists later. I mean, there are plenty examples of that, like our colleague Alan Senauke who was a student radical at Columbia University in the '60s and then came into Buddhism later. But eventually what happens is that Buddhism becomes the core identity, because it's seen as the grounding for social work, and without that grounding, you can lose what we feel are essential aspects of social activism, like non-violence, open-mindedness and holding suffering without over-reacting.

In INEB, almost everyone agrees that if they don't have that Buddhist identity (which means that they're a Buddhist practitioner), then they won't be able to properly do their social work or accomplish what they want to accomplish, because the Buddhist practice offers them a variety of really important tools for grounding themselves and understanding how to deal with others.

We talk about three different levels of engagement. There are the tools that you use for personal practice that help keep you grounded, that can help keep you from burning out and that help to see how to deal with the world. Then there are relational tools that Buddhism has for dealing with others, dealing with enemies, dealing with difficult people. And then at the third level are the Buddhist tools for understanding the world and how to see and understand society.

-------
Source:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matt-bieber/buddhist-activism-the-international-network-of-engaged-buddhists_b_1728546.html
Note: the full interview is available at The Wheat and Chaff (http://www.thewheatandchaff.com/ineb-watts/). Follow Matt Bieber on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PMatty_Bieber


View the original article here

Sunday, June 26, 2011

Buddhist nun's social activism

Home Personality

Sydney, Australia -- The Australian Buddhist nun featured here on Eureka Street TV breaks the stereotype of Buddhists as being quiet, mellow and laid back. She is larger than life, a very colourful character, and it's easy to be distracted by the colour.

As described in a December 2000 article in The Age, Robina Courtin has 'been a black belt in karate, one of many daughters in a large Catholic family, a supporter of the Black Panthers, a radical lesbian separatist feminist and a lot else besides ... she speaks at a million miles an hour and can swear like a truck driver/politician. But all that is colour. The substance is that she is a Buddhist nun.'

Courtin is a woman of great substance. She has been editorial director of a prominent Buddhist publishing house, director of a project to bring Buddhist teachings to prisoners, and is now a highly respected teacher of Buddhism in western countries.

Courtin was born in Melbourne in 1944 and was raised a Catholic. She went to a Catholic girls' school, and, after realising she couldn't fulfill her wish to become a priest, shifted her desires towards a vocation as a Carmelite nun.

But alongside her deep and abiding interest in religion, she was drawn in many other directions. She loved music and had a good voice. As a teenager, at a school fete, by chance she bought a record by Billie Holiday whose singing awakened a passion for black American music, and an appreciation of the injustices and prejudice suffered by African Americans. This stirred the beginnings of a strong social conscience, and a drive to become a social activist.

As a young adult she went to London to study singing. While there she joined the feminist movement, and began work on behalf of prisoners' rights.

She spent time living back in Australia and the USA and, in 1974, began studying martial arts. Injuries from a freak accident in 1976 prevented her from practising karate, so she decided to attend a Buddhist retreat in Queensland conducted by leading Tibetan teachers, Lama Thubten Yeshe and Lama Zopa Rinpoche. She was captivated by these monks and by Buddhism. This set the direction for the rest of her life.

The following year she went to Kathmandu in Nepal and studied at Kopan Monastery. There she was ordained as a Buddhist nun in the Tibetan Gelugpa tradition, in the lineage of Lama Yeshe and Lama Zopa.

Since then Courtin has worked in various capacities for the Foundation for the Preservation of the Mahayana Tradition (FPMT) which was founded by Lama Yeshe in 1975. Lama Zopa is spiritual director of the organisation. The FPMT has monasteries and nunneries in six countries, meditation centres in 40 countries, and runs health and nutrition clinics, hospices and programs in prisons around the globe.

According to its website, the FPMT provides 'integrated education through which people's minds and hearts can be transformed into their highest potential for the benefit of others, inspired by an attitude of universal responsibility'.

In the 1980s and '90s Courtin was editorial director of the FPMT's Wisdom Publications, and editor of its magazine, Mandala.

From 2000 to 2009, she was founding director of the FPMT's Liberation Prison Project in the USA which looked after the spiritual needs of hundreds of prisoners spread through some 150 institutions, sending them Buddhist literature and letters, visiting and giving teachings and advice.

In this role, she once asked Lama Zopa to write a card to a young Latino prisoner serving a life sentence. He wrote: 'Your prison is nothing in comparison with the prison of ordinary people: the prison of ego-grasping, the prison of attachment, the prison of anger, depression and pride.'

Courtin often repeats these words, and they have inspired her to take Buddhist teachings to broader society, to spread its message among ordinary people. This is now her main work.

To read or leave comments on this article, click here.

-------
Peter Kirkwood is a freelance writer and video consultant with a master's degree from the Sydney College of Divinity.

View the original article here